Last month, delegates to our Synodical convention in Houston decided that a special convention will be held in 2009 somewhere in America on some date and time, all to be determined at a later date. The idea is to finally deal with the issues associated with how the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod is governed. While I believe this is a necessary topic that our Synod should discuss, the cost of the convention has me baffled.
The price tag: $2 Million.
Next year, all churches within the LC-MS will be assessed dues for this convention. That means in 2008, not only will we have to pay our dues for our district convention in 2009, but also dues for this special convention. Oh, and don’t forget: Our regularly scheduled tri-annual convention will be held in 2010, and we will be assessed for that convention as well.
For large churches in the Missouri-Synod, this is will not hurt their budgets. However, for smaller churches, getting hit with dues bills three times within a year is going to pinch already tight dollars. And do you want to know something?
There is no guarantee that the special convention will change anything within the Synod.
That’s right – there may be such a dramatic proposed shift in our church body’s governance that no one will feel comfortable with any kind of change. On the other hand, the proposed changes could be so lacking that the Synod in convention could reject it. However, congregations will still be assessed the $2 Million bill.
Changing the governance of a church is a hard process that does not happen overnight. It takes years of discussions and planning. For some reason, our Synod believes it can come up with a package of governance changes for an entire Synod and everyone will be happy. My friends, this is not likely to happen if the Synod talks about this behind closed doors.
What I don’t want to happen is to see our church’s dues flushed down the toilet because we can’t seem to figure out how we want our Synod to be governed. Pastors need to take the lead and publicly talk about how our Synod should be governed. The reason is simple – we are the ones on the front line, dealing with the Synod on a daily basis. We try to understand the bureaucratic mess that the LC-MS and sometimes, we shake our heads. Pastor have to stand up and make their opinions known and discuss the options as to how our Synod should act.
For example, we should ask questions like: Do we eliminate districts to save money? Should we make changes as to who can vote at our national Synodical convention? Are we going to eliminate some of the bureaucratic offices within the Synod? Is there a way to make the Synod more responsive to the needs of individual churches? Do we continue to move away from a congregationist Synodical structure, one that has been in place since the time of C.F.W. Walther, to an episcopate structure (think: Roman Catholic Church structure with bishops and archbishops who have great control over their diocese), one that is creeping into our Synod?
There are a lot of issues that need to be pondered, studied, and prayed over. We can’t rush something like this. That’s why Pastors have to take the ball and teach.
Powered by Qumana